Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Assimilation Is The Key To Happiness.
Debate Response
Assimilation is a culture killer. Immigrants come to this nation only knowing their costumes and way of life. It is impossible for us to expect people arriving in this nation to forget their old ways and just take on a completely different identity. In the society we live in today, it is hard for us not to understand and welcome the diversity of others. Here at the
Debate: Is Assimilation a Necessity?
Modern Day Orthodox Jews
Professor Oster had pointed out something very important to my attention. While I earlier stated that immigrants will eventually assimilate into American culture, that isn’t always the case. There are orthodox Jewish communities throughout the
“And, with a few exceptions, they are still often living in relative ease with their surrounding communities.”
This comment was taken from a comment on this post. I would completely agree that modern Orthodox Jews are able to live with the surrounding communities. Today’s modern day Orthodox Jews are accepted with ease in society because society has change a lot in the last 50 years. We live in a society that is more accepting of people different and diversity isn’t only welcome, but encouraged. As discussed in Eli, the Fanatic, Woodenton was considered a “modern community,” but was not even close to as accepting as we are today of people of different religion, race, or beliefs. While I might have generalized about immigrants always assimilating, society today is more accepting of their way of life and beliefs.
Stepping Out Of The Social Order
How Does Emerson idea of social order relate to Eli, the Fanatic?
In Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay, Self Reliance, Emerson’s argues for forming our own opinions and standing up for our own beliefs. “To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men,--that is genius (Emerson, Self Reliance).” Emerson would respond to the story of Eli, the Fanatic by agreeing with the actions of Eli. Eli is doing what he feels is right and not conforming to the opinions of others. As the story progresses, Eli has a goal of finding peace between the two sides. “The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried (Emerson, Self Reliance).” Eli doesn’t know what the outcome of his final actions will be, but knows he must try to understand what it really means to be “greenie” in a society that doesn’t accept him. Eli was willing to go outside the norm and try something different. Emerson’s essay, Self Reliance, would say that Eli had become a “nonconformist” and by lessoning to the voices in when hi is alone, he is truly an individual.
By condoning Eli’s actions, he would say the towns’ people are in the wrong. “Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members (Emerson, Self Reliance).” The town as a whole was stopping Eli from being who he really wanted to be. Throughout Eli’s life he tried to break out of what society told him he should be and when he did they said he was having a breakdown. When Eli steps outside of the social order, he reveals to society what is wrong with it and society as a whole is unable to accept their shortcoming. So instead of their flaws, societies cover them up and don’t even bother facing them. That meant Eli had to be removed from society until he could re-conform to American ideals. “The virtue in most request is conformity. Self-reliance is its aversion. It loves not realities and creators, but names and customs (Emerson, Self Reliance).” Eli reverted to his old customs and ignored the realities that have been forced upon him. The story of Eli, the Fanatic is an excellent look at Emerson’s theory of self reliance and shows how society glorifies conformity when the individual should be more significant.
Response to Put My Shoes On And See How It Feels
But is he really or is the town set on the morals that anyone who does not assimilate to their ways is crazy?
This is a very interesting question Jared raises and it can be looked at from both sides. First is from the side of the towns a person. The town hired Eli to solve their problem of the newly arrived Eastern European Jews into their small suburb community. While they were also Jewish, they had already assimilated into
Looking at this conflict from the side we see a small community of Eastern European Jews that have lived through the horrors of World War II and were looking for a place to practice their religion and way of life without being bothered about their ways. I would not say they are crazy either. The only way of life they know is the one from back in
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Put My Shoes On And See How It Feels.
Monday, April 2, 2007
American vs. European Jews
World War II displaced the Jewish people more so then any other war in modern history. The rift it caused between Jewish people that experienced it and Jewish people who didn’t was enormous. European Jewish had kept to their strict code of religious order and they were persecuted for their practices throughout
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Summary and Thoughts
At the start Eli is focused and determined, but we later find that Eli is actually mixed up because of his wife, career and surroundings. He is determined that man in the suit to take off what he is wearing (the black suit - identity) and put on Eli’s green, lawyer suit (assimilation). The Black suit represents old, traditional, European ways. By changing suits, the man would have to change his culture. The Black suit shows that the man is not assimilated, especially since all the traditional Jewish males wore them. It represents their isolationism from the world. The men that wear the Black suits have their own attire, language and culture. Something that Eli gave up when he put on this green suit. Of course a suite dose not make a man who he is. It is the man inside of the suite that makes the man wearing it. I think Eli is so into his American way that he has lost his memory of who he used to be and what he believed.
http://www.enotes.com/short-story-criticism/roth-philip-milton
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Assimilation
Assimilation, as defined by the social sciences, is the process of integration where immigrants are flushed into larger communities. In doing this, it creates for an instant loss of the characters of that immigrant which makes him different. When a immigrants comes to a new, the native people deem it nesisary to change the immigrant into what their culture has created to be normal. Looking at it from the host point of view, they are only doing this to keep order in their country. Also they do this inorder to help the imegrants get along in thier world. Mainly in doing this, It guides and helps the immegrent become one with socicety and allwos for an easyer life. If you look at it in the eyes of the immegrent, why should they change and what is the bid deal about living a life thats is not what they know. Over time these immigrants will no longer look or seem to be immigrants because they will now be seen to be as similar to every one else. A region where assimilation is occurring is at most times referred to as a melting pot. Assimilation may be voluntary. This is usually the case with most incoming immigrants. It may also be forced upon a group. This is usually the case with the receiving host country. Immigration may be used in other ways where immigrants have a greater interest to the political and economical leaders more than they would to the interest of the weak. National groups are strongly urged to assimilate however there is often much resistance in spite of the use of governmental force. Assimilation can have negative implications for national minorities. After assimilation, the distinctive features of the original culture will be minimized and may even disappear altogether. This is especially true in situations where the institutions of the dominant culture initiate programs to assimilate or integrate minority culture. One may think that "is it even possible for an individual to assimilate at all?" Ethnic minority individuaals who have regular association with non-ethnic minority people are often successful at assimilating. It has beeen argued that occurrences of assimilation are really only occurrences of compatibility of cultures. Is it hard to distinguish between situations where a given ethnic group has assimilated and situations where said group has merely become a contributing sector of society? Most scholars of immigration, say that immigrants often fit into host societies through adaptation, more selectively than assimilation. These immegrents keep their ethnic characteristics and culture depending on how the culture meets their needs in the host society. Assimilation commonly includes the conversion of religious members of a minority group, especially Judaism. Before the mid-19th century, most Jews were forced to live in small towns and limited to thir education. The only way Jews could get ahead in the host culture was to forget their identification with co-religionists and become assimilated Jews. In the the 20th century, rapid assimilation in the form of Jewish-Christian intermarriage whithered the ranks of Orthodox Judaism pretty bad. Jewish law dose not recognize children of non-Jewish mothers as Jewish, and further, the children of intermarriage may not be raised with a strong Jewish identity and tend to intermarry themselves. Update of March 22, 2007 12:22 AM
http://health.enotes.com/public-health-encyclopedia/assimilation
First discussion question
Background Information on Philip Roth
Phillip Roth was born on
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
Blog Topic
This blog is dedicated to Philip Roth’s writing on Jewish assimilation. By using Roth’s Eli, the Fanatic, we will discuss how people of the Jewish faith entered American society and how they were treated my other sections of the American population.